There’s a part of me that wants to watch and read everything Bill Moyers has ever said or written.
Why?
Because I would then be educated enough to design a website that explains to Americans exactly what I think is wrong with our country. I would use prose and visualizations that would make it so blindingly clear to everyone:
- the insidious corporate influence on our government
- how our preference for “the vivid anecdote [over] the dry statistical fact” insidiously helps us blind ourselves to reality
- the ridiculousness of the two-party system
- that little else matters if we don’t change the national diet, radically
We’re not going to be able to go another decade with the blinders on. And so I try to imagine the perfect whiteboard drawing that perfectly clarifies our problems. Until someone can accomplish this (hint: despite his strengths, it won’t be our current President), our society is a rich tapestry with fraying seams.
Stuff on my mind:
The Johns clan migrated to Minnesota 29 years ago today. I wonder if I’ll ever be truly accepted as a Minnesotan?
I’m feeling this guy’s pain. There’s some less than PC language here.
To make up for some of the language in the last post, see my friend Matt in the trailer to the film, Offense Taken. They call Matt “George” for some reason.
If the press is to be believed, John Kerry is the frontrunner for Secretary of State in the Obama administration. Diplomacy through boredom? Meh. Gimme Bill Richardson without the beard, and a side order of Richard Clarke as Director of Homeland Security.
I’ve reached 100 followers on Twitter. We’ll see if, at this time next week, I’m at 200 or 20.
Who’s going to be the next Doctor Who? I say bring back the Ninth Doctor.
My company is doing a Gong Show for the holiday party in early January. Please leave your ideas for my act in the comments. Please remember, I’ll want to have an ounce of dignity when it’s all over.
Finally, enjoy another entertaining piece of journalism by Michael Lewis. This time, he shows us a slice of what’s gone wrong with Wall Street recently.
The folks at fivethirtyeight.com are doing a bang up job of doing the math with some informed and fairly objective analysis. They have some fascinating analysis about the upcoming Franken-Coleman Minnesota Senate vote recount.
Determining the winner of a vote recount depends on three primary factors:
- the original margin (221 for Coleman),
- the fraction of total votes that weren’t originally counted but will be counted in a hand recount (what they call Correctable Error Rate), and
- the distribution of newly counted votes
If the distribution of newly counted votes is 50/50, Coleman wins, as Franken can’t gain any ground. The higher the fraction of previously uncounted votes are, the more potential there is for Franken to make up new ground.
At this point, a reasonable range of estimates of these parameters allows us to assess the odds.
Votes don’t get counted because they’re overvoted (the machine decides a ballot selected two candidates) or undervoted (the machine decides a ballot did not select any candidates.) Overvotes are almost always unintentional; undervotes are usually intentional (leave an X instead of filling in the oval, etc.) Probably, less than one percent of votes will be reclassified from over- or under-voted to a definite vote during the hand recount; about 15% of those will go to Dean Barkley. This by itself would not be enough for Franken to make up the 221-vote difference. But together with the other factor, the distribution of new votes, Franken could come out ahead.
Why? Because undervotes and overvotes occur predominantly among the elderly, low-income and low-education voters, and first-time voters. (The article also mentions minority voters… I think this part of the reasoning applies only to those for whom English isn’t their primary language.) In this election, the elderly vote is split, but the youth, first-time, and “minority” vote have gone to Franken.
Now the author can crunch some numbers. The highlights:
- If the uncounted fraction of votes that will be counted is 0.90% (25,000 votes), and Franken takes 50.50% of those votes, the odds are even that Franken will win.
- If the uncounted fraction of votes that will be counted is 0.50% (about 13,900), and Franken takes 51% of those votes, then Franken has a 57% chance of winning.
- If Franken captures 53% of the new votes, then the number of new votes counted has to be less than 0.25% (less than 7,000 votes) for Coleman to have a chance.
So, if you’re for Coleman, you want to diminish the number of new votes, and hope that they count more of the middle- and upeer-class. If you’re a Franken supporter, you want lots and lots of new votes, on the theory that the newly-counted votes represent the “vulnerable vote.”
If you’re a Barkley supporter, you’ll need a time machine set to 4 November 2002.
None of this, of course, takes into account any legal wrangling that may ensue. How a municipality can allow their voting booth to put an inaccurate date and time stamp on a ballot is beyond my comprehension.
No matter what, stay tuned to www.fivethirtyeight.com for some reasonably objective analysis.